The Upswing -Robert D Putnam - Fantastic Book
THE
UPSWING: How America Came Together a Century Ago and How We Can To It Again, Robert D Putnam and Shaylyn Romney
Garrett’s most recent book is simply amazing!
It is incredibly relevant for anyone interested in the political divide
between Republicans/right-wing and Democrats/liberal-center people. It focuses significantly upon race, gender
and class.
Putnam/Garrett’s
basic hypothesis is that a (letter) “U” – aptly describes our movement from the
gilded age of the late 1800’s through the present. He sees a movement from a societal “I” focus
towards more of a “We” focus and then back to an “I (completing the “U”). Timewise things moved to “We” through the
progressive era, World War I, (with a lull in the Roaring Twenties), the
Depression, World War II, the post-war
periods through the Civil Rights era of the 1950’s and 1960s. Then starting in a period between the mid-
1960’s and the early 1970’s, things have moved back from “We” to “I” through
2020, when the book was published.
The author’s
emphasize in detail how the “We” has commonly not been a fully inclusive “We”. It has generally been a middle-class white
men’s movement. Upper-middle class
white women have pushed women’s issues, often opposing the interests of Black
(and sometimes working-class) Women.
They make very clear that a 21st century “We Movement” will
need to be much, much more inclusive to succeed.
Putnam and
Garrett reject some common popular beliefs about when significant progress has
been made related to racism and sexism.
They note the focus on women’s rights being limited to the success in
getting the vote in 1920 and the Women’s Movement of the mid-60’s into the 70’s. Similarly, they note how commonly the Civil
Rights Movement of the 1950’s-1960’s is seen as the period when racism was successfully
dealt with.
While not
minimizing the popular beliefs in part, the authors speak of things being
significantly more complex. They note
that significant growth occurred in much of the first half of the 20th
century, leading up to what progress was made in the mid-20th century. They note, for example, how Black family
earnings, while significantly less than the earnings of white families, were
moving closer and closer over the first half of the Twentieth Century.
Most significantly,
Putnam and Garrett note how racism (particularly) and to a slightly lesser
degree sexism, grew over the past 50 years.
They emphasize how white resistance to Black People moving into their neighborhoods
and schools, have resulted in an “I” mindset, that has significantly excluded
Black People since the 1970’s.
Quoting from
the book:
The
polarization that began in the late 1960s was initially driven primarily by
race, as the two parties became more distinct and more internally
homogeneous. Johnson and Nixon
(ironically, each a moderate within his own party)) were the twin progenitors
of that turn toward polarization, Johnson by signing the Civil Rights bills in
1964-65 that (as he himself reportedly had foretold -footnote) cost the
Democrats their “Southern strategy” in 1968 to bring those same conservative
Southerners into the Republican fold (footnote). … By 1975, however, Ronald Reagan was raising
an impassioned banner of “no pale pastels, but bold colors,” and after 1980 the
Reagan Revolution pulled the Republican Party further and further to the right,
a movement that would last well into the twenty-first century.(footnote) The polarization that had begun with civil
rights spread quickly across many other issues, as the parties took opposing
stances on issues that had not previously been partisan, thus extending and
reinforcing the basic polarization.
These increasingly polarizing issues include: … “Big
Government”….Abortion and religion … The environment… Education (p.84-6)
Beginning
in the early 1940’s, Northern Democrats began to champion civil rights
legislation, which some scholars consider to have been a “trial run” for later
victories. (p.229)
As Black servicemen
came home from fighting for democratic principles, their willingness to submit
to undemocratic realities at homes frayed… One example among many was the
action of Navy veteran Otis Pinkert, who earned three promotions in the war but
on the train ride home was forced to sit in a segregated car. When he got to his hometown of Tuskegee,
Alabama, he expressed his anger by picketing a store that sold primarily to
blacks but employed only whites. He
succeeded in shutting the store down and getting a black manager installed in
exchange for ending the protest (1) (p.229)
During
the closing decades of the twentieth century:
·
Gains in relative life expectancy for black Americans stagnated, beginning
to improve again only at the start of the twenty-first century(140)
·
The closing of the black-white gap in infant mortality rates plateaued
and in recent years the infant mortality rate for black Americans has increased(141
·
… Relative rates of black homeownership plateaued and even declined
·
Schools began to resegregate(143) (p.240)
Collective racial resentments are among the centerpieces of
the new laissez-faire racism era (146) (p.241)
The Sixties was not only a cultural turning point … when…otherwise
unrelated public crises brought many long-simmering conflicts to a boil:
·
The assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK
·
The Vietnam War …
·
The urban crisis and urban riots
·
The women’s movement
·
The pill and the sexual revolution
·
Watergate and Nixon’s resignation
·
Stagflation and oil shortages and economic malaise (p.306-7)
We saw earlier that it is fruitless to look for a single
cause of the we-to-I pivot that occurred during the long Sixties. (p.312)
One final feature of the Progressive movement that is
relevant to today’s challenges is its youthfulness. All of the reformers and writers whose
stories and ideas we have featured in this chapter were in their thirties or
younger when they became powerful voices and forces for change (p.334)
First is a caution to avoid the temptation to
overcorrect. … Progressives reformers
quickly learned that in order to succeed they would have to compromise-to find
a way to put private property, personal liberty, and economic growth on more
equal footing with communitarian ideals and the protection of the weak and vulnerable,
and to work within existing systems to bring about change(27) (p.335)
Throughout this book we have argued that although America’s “we”
had gradually become more capacious during the first half of the twentieth
century, and as we continued the long historical task of redressing racial and
gender inequities, we were in 1960 (and still are) very far from perfection on
those dimensions. Americans could have and should have pushed further toward
greater equality. … …we did’t take seriously enough the challenge
of full inclusion. Therefore the
question we face today is not whether we can or should turn back the tide of
history, but whether we can resurrect the earlier communitarian virtues in a
way that does not reverse the progress that we’ve made in terms of individual
liberties. (p.341)
The authors cite a huge number of studies to document the “I-We-I”
historical movement of our country. They
ask us to learn from the successes and failures of the first half of the Twentieth
Century. They particularly urge us to
help work in large numbers to build for a inclusive positive “We” future. They emphasize that such an effort can not
rely upon charismatic leaders. Putnam
and Garrett put their hopes in the leadership of our youth. They are very clear that we, white people,
must be seriously committed to counter the systemic racism that has gotten
worse in significant ways of the past half-century. They believe we can learn from the past, and
begin an “Upswing” that will finally make our country welcoming for all. The insightfully wish to help end our
massive current polarized malaise.
Hopefully we will listen and do a lot better! This is a great book, well worth
reading. (I think it nicely complements
Richard Rothstein’s excellent: The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How
Our Government Segregated America.)
Comments
Post a Comment